Sexism, Misogyny, Hillary Clinton (Video)

This powerful video from ILEwoman was added to YouTube on March 30, 2008, so perhaps many of you have seen it. It was new to me. I thought it was a poignant reminder of what we’re fighting for, and who was and is at the forefront of that fight.

Feat. Clinton supporter, Ed Rendell, before he turned his support toward Obama, endorsing a dream ticket, along with Chuck Schumer, Lanny Davis and others. That’s a link to those who want an Obama Clinton 08. Senator Clinton has disavowed such efforts since suspending her campaign, but what actually could she do? She was pressured out of making any bids, whether she wanted to or not, by saying she was putting on the pressure after the last primary. Who knows? I always thought it was an Obama == DNC ploy. Hillary had always said, whatever, for the good of the Party.

Many supporters say never on that one. It’s beneath her. She’d never, because of how he treated her, Michelle, Bill, yada yada. She’d be blamed if his administration goes south.

I’ll admit, I’m undecided on it. She would be in power and could move forward her agenda. Although, I can’t imagine it happening due to the DNC Chicago HQ chess move of the week. Who’s surprised after Obama announced last week, “I’m the head of the Party now”?

I know I will not accept another VP choice. But what If it so happened, after all this, that the DNC realized they had to have Hillary on the ticket to win, assuming Obama doesn’t self-destruct before that — which I doubt will happen with all this extreme orchestration —

Would you vote for a dream ticket? (Please keep it civil if you’re opposed, thank you.)

She-Deviler Media Gang Unrepentant–Boycott MSNBC!

women men hillary supporters voters BOYCOTT MSNBC NBC RUSSERT MATTHEWS OLBERMANN sexist misogynistc media bias

Click above to Boycott MSNBC and NBC!

* Author’s note: Subsequent to publishing this article, I learned that MSNBC News Commentator Tim Russert had passed away suddenly. I send my condolences to his family, and wish him well on his next assignment. —LBNYC

Women and men have been decrying the rampant sexism and misogyny lobbed at Hillary Clinton during the Democratic Primary season — made especially clear after she was left standing in a thinning field of candidates over the last four months. It seems that the better she did, the more the MSM tried to knock her down. During this time, millions of citizens took notice and protested using the power of emails, blogs, phone calls, and remote controls to turn off offensive network news, MSNBC, CNN, late night comedians, Oprah, and The View. They protested with their hands and feet, as they walked into voting booths and pulled the lever “yes” for Hillary Clinton; and as they walked away from the DNC, stopped contributing, and mailed back their membership cards.

Now, in their post-analysis, The Media appears to be just fine with what happened. Although millions of citizens have decried their actions as degrading to women, not to mention a former first lady, current US Senator, and Presidential candidate, their protests have fallen on deaf ears. Actually network high ups see the hullabaloo as excessive, but more than that: it’s the candidate’s fault — she used the coverage to try to create momentum. I would say to them, “right, blame the victim,” BUT Hillary Clinton is nobody’s victim.

In today’s NYT article, Media Charged With Sexism in Clinton Coverage, co-authors Katharine Q. Seelye and Julie Bosman write that most outlets assess their coverage was fair:

. . . many in the news media — with a few exceptions, including Katie Couric, the anchor of the “CBS Evening News” — see little need for reconsidering their coverage or changing their approach going forward. Rather, they say, as the Clinton campaign fell behind, it exploited a few glaring examples of sexist coverage to whip up a backlash and to try to create momentum for Mrs. Clinton.

The Media sees no mistakes in their coverage.

Nicholas Lemann, dean of the Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University, said: “I have not had a lot of regretful conversations with high-ranking media types and political reporters about how unfair their coverage of the Hillary Clinton campaign was.”

Among journalists, he added, the coverage “does not register as a mistake that must not be allowed to happen again.”

But, never fear, Howard Dean is here. He really gets it now. He’s finally hip to our cause, and I’m sure he’ll handle it.

Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic Party, who says he was slow to pick up on charges of sexism because he is not a regular viewer of cable television, [Good one! I guess he forgot to read all of our emails back in February, March, April, May, and June] is taking up the cause after hearing an outcry from what he described as a cross-section of women, from individual voters to powerful politicians and chief executives.

“The media took a very sexist approach to Senator Clinton’s campaign,” Mr. Dean said in a recent interview.

“It’s pretty appalling,” he said, adding that the issue resonates because Mrs. Clinton “got treated the way a lot of women got treated their whole lives.”

Mr. Dean and others are now calling for a “national discussion” of sexism.

Sure, I’m up for that “national discussion.” Do you think that Sen. Obama will hold those after he does the Town Halls with John McCain?

But really, sexism, schmexism. Give us back our legitimate candidate and our votes! Can you do that? Mmm, I didn’t think so.

Any bets that Florida’s new Obama-selected delegates won’t have full voting privileges restored at the Democratic Convention in Denver? Any one?

USE THE POWER OF YOUR CLICKER AND YOUR WALLET! BOYCOTT SEXIST MEDIA COVERAGE!

Hunter Commencement Degraded By Inclusion Of Matthews

HUNTER COMMENCEMENT DEGRADED BY THE INCLUSION OF INVITED SPEAKER CHRIS MATTHEWS

June 1, 2008

Dear Hunter College Community,

As you may know, MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews has been invited to speak at Hunter’s graduation day ceremony on Wednesday, June 4th. Administrative staff at Hunter looked for a speaker who could address political issues in this election year and decided to invite MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann. After agreeing to speak, Olbermann then backed out of his commitment and instead of returning to the drawing board, a Hunter staff member called MSNBC to see who they could send in Olbermann’s place. Matthews was offered and accepted. There was no formal vetting or real consideration given to the selection of this particular graduation speaker.

Mr. Matthews has gained notoriety throughout the country for years of insensitive, sexist comments on his show “Hardball” and his insulting treatment of women—not only, most visibly, Senator Clinton but also his television colleagues who happen to be female. Matthews referred to Clinton as a “she devil,” called her a “strip-teaser” and “witchy.” He has referred to men who support her as “castratos in the eunuch chorus.” He has commented on the physical appearance of women including his CNBC colleague Erin Burnett, calling her “beautiful” and “a knockout” during a discussion of economic news. In an interview with John and Elizabeth Edwards, Matthews asked the former Senator, “Does she bite your balls like this when you go home?” He then went on to ask, “What is this with the equal marriages? Why do people marry their equals? It used to be different. What happened to the Stepford wives? The good old days?” These are but a small sample of Matthews’s on-air sexist comments.

It is, in our view, disgraceful for Hunter College, for all of us who love this institution and most of all for our present and future students who look to Hunter as a bastion of women’s empowerment, to confer this honor on someone whose words in public so contradict the most basic feminist and civic values. Inviting him to be our speaker is asking him to represent Hunter College on this important occasion, and this should never have happened. We are outraged.

We urge President Jennifer Raab to adopt a process in the future that would prevent such mistakes. We hope you’ll join us in this call to improve the process by which the college selects commencement speakers. Write to President Raab to encourage her to establish a more careful, transparent, and democratic process. Her email address is: jennifer.raab@hunter.cuny.edu.

Sincerely,

Students, Adjunct Faculty, Policy Committee of the
Women and Gender Studies Program

Let Hillary Hear From You Now!

“What does Hillary want? What does she want?” she asked us last night. She wants to know if and how we will support her.

What do you, one of 18 million who voted for her, want her to do? Write to Hillary! Right now! Tell Senator Clinton how much you appreciate what she has already accomplished, and let her know what you think she should do going forward. Oh, and please add to the collection plate while you’re at it.

And what will you do? Will you continue to support her? Should she take it to the Convention? Should she concede? Should she contest at the Credentials Committee the DNC RBC’s decision to rob her of votes? Should she be VP? (See Lanny Davis’ campaign: http://www.womenforfairpolitics.com.) Should she start a third party? Should she suspend her campaign and reserve her delegates? Should there be a vote on the Convention floor? Should she end her campaign now, this week? Should there be investigations of alleged improprieties reportedly pushed on voters by Obama supporters and operatives at caucuses and polling places? Should the Superdelegates put their endorsements to the side and see what happens between now and the Convention? Should she endorse Obama? Will she wait to see what falls out of Obama’s closet between now and Denver? Is the Electorate College electable?

And just last week, in light of Scott McClelland’s new Bush bashing book, the MSM gave two seconds of regret that they did not do their jobs leading up to the war. Yet again, they have seriously failed in their vetting of Obama, and given a pass to an untested candidate in crucial and dangerous times. In an election year when “we” Dems were a shoe-in to win. McCain, Karl Rove, and Fox News are just beginning to ramp it up, and I can feel the tidal wave of what’s approaching. The Repubs DO NOT WANT TO RUN AGAINST HILLARY. Again, and I’ll keep repeating it, Superdelegates can change their minds anytime up to the Convention.

Hillary has often told the electorate that she didn’t envy our decision as voters. What decisions she must face as she weighs her options within a party whose members have mostly turned their backs on her, refusing to defend her in light of unprecedented sexist, misogynist, race-baiting attacks from all corners. How they have blocked her at every turn, all the while stealing her votes, her thunder, and her record. How we all mourned when Al Gore wimped out in Y2K and didn’t take the strong stand we needed so desperately at the time. But when the Party got an experienced fighter and uniter, they conspired to take her down. And if she stayed and fought for the 18 million of us, would the MSM and Party babies cry out and magnify to the rest of the world, including the villages of Kenya, that “an entitled white woman” has stolen the election that in truth was stolen from her by an “historic black candidate” in a fancy table cloth trick?

I can only imagine the pressure she’s feeling from Pelosi and Reid et al, as their must decide immediately letter circulates through our hollowed halls of government. How many of them no longer exist for me? And yet, what can Hillary do without them in the reality of corporate power schemes? Oh, right, she vowed to investigate corporate power. Hmmm. New politics, my foot.

For all that she has stood up to, I’m fine with her taking her sweet time to weigh her options, considering the position she is in. I’m even finer seeing her make the MSM and Democrats squirm in their seats, crap and all. Hillary Clinton has won the big states, the swing states, and garnered the most popular votes of any US Presidential Primary candidate in history. Hold strong, Hillary! We’ve got your back.

O’Reilly Rants for Hillary (Video)

Video clip from Bill O’Reilly’s May 29, 2008 broadcast on FOX News. He rants about how NBC and MSNBC anointed Obama and gave Hillary the shaft. These actions, O’Reilly said, “are a stain that will never go away.” He’s so right.

I can’t believe I’m agreeing with O’Reilly on anything or rather that he’s agreeing with me. And I can’t believe how good it feels to have someone rant out loud on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s despicable treatment by the MSM in this campaign. Feels really great!

Don’t Call Me Stupid!

What’s with all the stupid talk? I’m getting annoyed. After all, I did attend four years of college, the last two at UC Berkeley in the turbulent, riotous, psychedelic sixties. However, my college career waned when I found the plush, wild nature of Berkeley’s surrounding hills much more fascinating than the innards of a classroom, and spent my time there. With four majors in four years, from Theater to Philosophy to English to Art, I needed more credits in the latter and didn’t complete my degree. I was searching for something between the lines. Like many of my baby boomer generation, I dropped out, not only from college, but from doing business as usual.

Since then, I’ve trained professionally and earned multiple certifications after long-term, in-depth study in my field of work. But when filling the education level checkbox on various online or official forms, I’m honest. Previously, for highest degree of education completed, one could only choose from high school and BA/BS, on up. Sadly, there must now be so many of us dropouts that we get a whole category called “some college.” (Maybe someday they’ll even have one specifically for me: FYCND, 4 yrs college no degree. kidding.) Please note that I am not advocating this or saying it’s a good thing. Ask my kids if I stressed the importance of completing college in order to better open doors, be able to continue with their studies later, not have to go back, etc. And as a parent I’ll admit, they did as I said, not as I did, to my relief.

The point is, I received a well-rounded education from kindergarten through college, and unbelievably something sunk in. There are many citizens and voters like me who may have completed vocational school, started their own business, entered the family business, pursued an art, craft, or skill. They may be a stay at home or a working mom, a mechanic, office, service or mine worker. They may have been called to other things in life, but it doesn’t mean that they, we, are stupid! The “hard-working, uneducated voters” that seem to be attributed to Hillary aren’t idiots, many of us actually keep up with politics, US and world current events, and cultural and societal goings on. (Thank God and Al Gore for the internet.) Some even call us “street smart.” woo hoo.

Sadly, our education system is in the dumpster, thanks to years of war funding, and the unfunded No Child Left Behind. These inane policies left no room for study of the arts, which saves and ignites the curiosity and literally stimulates the brains and minds of so many kids that don’t fit into the round hole. America is dumbing down and more children are being left behind. Luckily, one candidate, with a career-long commitment to improving education, has a plan to keep kids in school. Well, she has many plans, but here’s Hillary’s plan to reduce the dropout rate in high school students.

“Addressing the Crisis of Untapped Potential” was released on December 11, 2007, long before Super Tuesday. It’s clear that Sen. Clinton’s plans are an action step component of her comprehensive and compassionate world-view.

“Today in Bennettsville, South Carolina, Hillary Clinton outlined her plan to cut the dropout rate among minority students in half and help a new generation of Americans pursue their dreams. Clinton would invest more than $1 billion in programs that identify and support at-risk youth, provide early intervention, fund small schools with intensive personalized instruction, and recruit and train excellent teachers and principals in hard-to-serve areas. She would also establish high quality, universal pre-kindergarten to make sure all children are prepared to learn from an early age.”

“We know that the education system is not working when close to half of African American and Hispanic students will not receive high school diplomas with their class. Disparities in our education system mean poor and minority children receive an education that is often separate and rarely equal. And the consequences are devastating,” Clinton said.

“I am setting a big goal for this country: to cut the dropout rate for students of color in half within a decade. I’ll address the crisis of untapped potential. I believe we can do it. I reject the fatalism which says we cannot reform our education system. I reject the notion that children dropping out of school are a lost cause – because when I’m president, these children will be my cause.”

When students don’t complete high school, there are negative and long-lasting consequences for them and for society. On virtually all measures, high school dropouts struggle. They earn $35,000 less per year than college graduates – a wage gap that translates into $1 million over the course of a lifetime. They are three times more likely than college graduates to be unemployed and twice as likely as high school graduates to slip into poverty.

Read Hillary’s plans to reduce the dropout rate.

Uneducated voters–I’m not sure what anyone means by this category I seem to fall into, but I’m starting to find it insulting to my intelligence. I’m smart enough to decide on a candidate of substance who has thoughtful plans to tackle the failings of the creationist years, and raise up our education system once again. I’m smart enough, and I dare say, so are you.

Sexism Might Sell, But I’m Not Buying It: Petition Campaign

Statement from the Women’s Media Center:

On May 23, The Women’s Media Center, along with our partners at Media Matters, launched, “Sexism Sells, But We’re Not Buying It,” a new video and online petition campaign illustrating the pervasive nature of sexism in the media’s coverage. While Hillary Clinton’s campaign has cast a spotlight on the issue of sexism, this isn’t a partisan issue: it’s about making sure that women’s voices are present and powerful in our national dialogue.

Let’s send a message to the media:

Sexism Might Sell, But We’re Not Buying It!

Click here to join the WMC petition campaign (scroll down page to sign up).

From WMC president Carol Jenkins:

Women are a driving force in the U.S. economy with a purchasing power of more than $7 trillion a year, and purchase fully 82 percent of all products and services in the U.S. Earlier this year, The Women’s Media Center joined NOW, the Feminist Majority, and the National Women’s Political Caucus to speak out against the particularly egregious remarks Chris Matthews made about Hillary Clinton’s campaign, when he said that “the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around” (MSNBC’s Morning Joe, January 9, 2008). Speaking for more than 15 million women across the United States, the coalition secured an on-air apology from Matthews, and assurances from NBC executives that steps were being taken to address the situation. Yet the situation persists, which is why The Women’s Media Center is taking this next step, releasing a video and launching an online petition campaign to allow women to speak out against this continuing sexism.

Read Carol Jenkins’ entire statement about the video campaign.

The Women’s Media Center strives to make women visible and powerful in the media. From our founding in 2004 by Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem to our advocacy and media relations work today, we are part of a strong feminist tradition that seeks to hold the media accountable for presenting the world as we know it.

Friendly nod to Cooney for posting the petition campaign at Hillary Clinton Forum.